Investing in climate tech isn’t just about cutting-edge technology—it’s about creating a lasting, positive impact on the planet. But how can you tell if your investment is actually making a difference? Whether you’re a venture capitalist, institutional investor, or impact-driven individual, it’s crucial to know how to assess the true impact of your climate tech investments.
In this guide, we’ll break down the criteria for evaluating impact , the best tools for measurement , and real-life case studies that showcase successful assessments. Let’s dig in.
Criteria for Evaluating Impact 1. Alignment with Sustainability Goals Before jumping into any climate tech venture, check how well the technology aligns with global sustainability frameworks like the EU Taxonomy . This framework helps ensure that investments contribute to reducing carbon emissions and meet specific environmental objectives. For example, the EU Taxonomy sets technical screening criteria to make sure investments foster a low-carbon economy.
2. Emissions Reduction Potential Not all technologies are created equal when it comes to emissions reduction . One key factor to evaluate is the emissions reduction potential (ERP) of the tech you’re investing in. Does it have the power to drive significant reductions in greenhouse gases? For example, technologies like carbon capture can have a higher ERP compared to smaller innovations. Learn more about ERP in PwC’s State of Climate Tech 2023 .
3. Lifecycle Assessment (LCA) To understand the complete environmental footprint of an investment, Lifecycle Assessment (LCA) is a critical tool. It evaluates the environmental impacts across the entire lifecycle of a product or technology, from material extraction to disposal. LCA is crucial for long-term sustainability and shows where there’s room for improvement. Check out this detailed guide to LCA from Impact VC .
Tools and Frameworks for Measurement 1. EU Taxonomy as a Measurement Tool One of the most effective tools for measuring the environmental impact of climate tech investments is the EU Taxonomy . It provides a common language and standards to help classify sustainable activities and investments, making it easier for investors to ensure their money is contributing to global climate goals. Dive deeper into the EU Taxonomy and its classifications here .
2. Venture Capital Frameworks for Impact More and more venture capital firms are integrating impact assessments into their investment strategies. For example, Planet A Ventures ties part of its carried interest to achieving measurable climate impact, ensuring that financial returns are linked to environmental benefits. This approach is becoming increasingly common among impact-driven VCs. Learn how Planet A Ventures applies these methods.
3. IIGCC’s Framework for Institutional Investors For larger investors, tools like those provided by the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC) are invaluable. Their climate investment frameworks focus on areas such as ambition, emission performance, and capital expenditure, offering a structured way to measure the success of climate tech investments. Explore IIGCC’s comprehensive guide here .
Case Studies of Successful Impact Assessments 1. Institutional Success Stories with IIGCC The Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC) has led the way in showcasing how large-scale investors can assess the impact of climate tech . Their case studies demonstrate the importance of linking emissions performance with capital allocation, ensuring that investments drive both environmental and financial returns. Take a look at some standout examples in IIGCC’s case studies .
2. VC Insights from Copenhagen Business School Research from Copenhagen Business School reveals how venture capitalists evaluate startups’ climate impact. Their methodology includes both qualitative interviews and quantitative data analysis , offering a robust framework to assess various technologies. The study highlights the importance of standardizing these assessments across industries. For a deeper dive, check out the full research .
3. Long-Term Strategies by FCLTGlobal FCLTGlobal offers excellent examples of how long-term climate tech investments can deliver both sustainability and financial returns . One standout case involves a solar energy startup that not only reduced emissions but also achieved strong financial performance over time. It’s a perfect illustration of how patient capital can drive both environmental impact and profit. Read more about this strategy at FCLTGlobal .
A Framework for Impact Evaluation So, how can you bring all of these elements together to evaluate climate tech effectively? Here’s a simple framework, inspired by Art Lapinsch’s insightful Tree of Climate Tech :
Environment : Does the tech significantly reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs)?Technology : Is it scalable and ready for commercialization?Law : Is it compliant with legal standards and regulations?Economics : Is it economically viable in the long run?Desire : Is there market demand for the technology?If you can tick all these boxes, you’ve got a climate tech investment that stands a real chance of making a positive environmental and financial impact. Explore the full framework in Lapinsch’s article here .
Conclusion: Make Your Investments Count Assessing the impact of climate tech investments doesn’t have to be complicated, but it does require the right tools and mindset. By focusing on criteria like sustainability alignment , emissions reduction potential , and lifecycle assessments , you can ensure that your investments are doing more than just generating returns—they’re creating lasting environmental change.
Here are two things I can help with:
Want to receive weekly actionable tips to boost your Climate Fund, Startup, and Career? Sign up for the newsletter here . Interested in joining our Investment Community to access the best Climate Tech deals? Join us at Climate Insiders .
.svg)
